NOTES


CA-Foundation > Business Laws > The Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Free Consent (Old & New)

‘Aadi’ applies to a banker for a loan at a time when there is stringency in the money market. The banker declines to make the loan except at an unusually high rate of interest. Aadi accepts the loan on these terms. Whether the contract is induced by undue influence? Decide.



Ans.
There is no undue influence. As between the parties on equal footing, the Court does not hold a transaction to be unconscionable merely on the ground of high rate of interest.
WHAT IS UNDUE INFLUENCE?

A contract is said to be induced by undue influence where:

1. one of the parties is in a position to dominate the will of the other and

2. he uses the position to obtain an unfair advantage over the other Sec. 16(1).

Section 16(2) provides that a person is deemed to be in a position to dominate the will of another where:

a. Where he holds a real or apparent authority over the other (For ex- master & servant, ITO & Assessee)

b. Where he stands in a fiduciary relationship to the other. Fiduciary relationship means a relationship of mutual trust and confidence. Such a relationship is supposed to exist in the following cases - father and son; guardian and ward; solicitor and client; doctor and patient; preceptor and disciple; trustee and beneficiary etc.

c. Where a party makes a contract with a person whose mental capacity is temporarily or permanently affected by reason of age, illness, or mental or bodily distress.

d. Where the contract is apparently unconscionable (i.e. unfair). Ex.: an unfair money lending transaction.

The following relationships usually raise a presumption of undue influence, viz:

(ii) Parent and child, (ii) guardian and ward, (iii) trustee and beneficiary, (iv) doctor and patient, (v) lawyer and client, (vi) spiritual guru and disciple. This list, however, is not exhaustive.

There is no presumption of existence of a power to dominate the will of another in the following cases: (a) Landlord and tenant, (b) Creditor and debtor, (c) Husband and wife. It has been held by judicial decisions that in all these cases, the party alleging undue influence must prove that undue influence existed.

Example I: A, a man enfeebled by disease of age, is induced by B’s influence over him as his medical attendant, to agree to pay B an unreasonable sum for his professional services. B has employed undue influence.

Example II: A, being in debt to B, the money-lender of his village, contracts a fresh loan on terms which appear to be unconscionable. It lies on B prove that the contract was not induced by undue influence.

Example III: A applies to a banker for a loan at a time when there is stringency in the money market. The banker declines to make the loan except at an unusually high rate of interest. A accepts the loan on these terms. This is a transaction in the ordinary course of business, and the contract is not induced by undue influence.


PreviousNext


Notes of The Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Free Consent (Old & New)



  1. What do you understand by “coercion” and “undue influence” under the provisions of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 ? What are the differences between them ?
    see in detail

  2. "Mere silence as to facts likely to affect the willingness of a person to enter into a contract is not fraud". Comment.
    see in detail

  3. ‘Aadi’ applies to a banker for a loan at a time when there is stringency in the money market. The banker declines to make the loan except at an unusually high rate of interest. Aadi accepts the loan on these terms. Whether the contract is induced by undue influence? Decide.
    see in detail

  4. Aabhas threatens to shoot Eashan if he does not sell his car to him for ₹ 20,000. Eashan signs the necessary documents for sale of car. Later on, Eashan wants to avoid the contract. Will he succeed? If so, why?
    see in detail

  5. Aadit and Eehaan were sailing in a ship which was on its way from London to Bombay. While the ship was passing through the Suez Canal, Aadit threatened Eehaan to throw him into the sea unless he agreed to sell his watch for ₹ 100. Eehaan agreed to sell the same. After reaching Bombay, Eehaan changed his mind. Can Aadit file a suit against Eehaan to get the watch?
    see in detail