DEVOLUTION OF JOINT LIABILITIES & JOINT
RIGHTS [SECS. 42 TO 45]
Devolution of joint liabilities (Section 42)
When
two or more persons have made a joint promise, then, unless a contrary
intention appears by the contract, all such persons, during their joint lives,
and, after the death of any of them, his representatives jointly with the
survivor or survivors and, after death of the last survivor, the
representatives of all jointly, must fulfil the promise.
According
to this section joint promisors must, during their joint lives, fulfil the
promise. And if any of them dies, his representative must, jointly with the
surviving promisors, fulfil the promise and so on. On the death of the last
survivor, the representatives of all of them must fulfil the promise. But this
is subject to any private arrangement between the parties. They may expressly
or impliedly prescribe a different rule.
Any one of joint promisors may be compelled
to perform [Section 43]
When
two or more persons make a joint promise, the promisee may, in the absence of
express agreement to the contrary, compel any (one or more) of such joint
promisors to perform the whole of the promise.
Each promisor may compel contribution.— Each of two or more
joint promisors may compel every other joint promisor to contribute equally
with himself to the performance of the promise, unless a contrary intention
appears from the contract.
Sharing of loss by default in contribution.— If any one of two or
more joint promisors makes default in such contribution, the remaining joint
promisors must bear the loss arising from such default in equal shares.
Illustrations
1. A, B
and C jointly promise to pay D 3,000 rupees. D may compel either A or B or C to
pay him 3,000 rupees.
2. A, B
and C jointly promise to pay D fee sum of 3,000 rupees. C is compelled to pay
the whole. A is insolvent, but his assets are sufficient to pay one-half of his
debts. C is entitled to receive 500 rupees from A's estate, and 1,250 rupees
from B.
3. A, B
and C are under a joint promise to pay D 3,000 rupees. C is unable to pay
anything and A is compelled to pay the whole. A is entitled to receive 1,500
rupees from B.
This section lays down three rules:
1. Firstly,
when a joint promise is made, and there is no express agreement to the
contrary, the promisee may compel any one or more of the joint promisors to
perform the whole of the promise. “A, B and C jointly promise to pay D 3000
rupees. D may compel either A or B or C to pay him 3000 rupees.” This implies
that unless there is a contract to the contrary, each joint-promisor is
individually liable for the entire performance. Thus the liability of
joint-promisors is joint as well as several “Several” means severable or
separable. Several liability of a joint-promisors is a liability which can be
separated from the joint liability and becomes an individual liability.
2. Secondly,
a joint promisor who has been compelled to perform the whole of the promise,
may require the other joint promisors to make an equal contribution to the
performance of the promise, unless a different intention appears from the
agreement. A, B and C are under a joint promise to pay D 3000 rupees. D recovers
the whole amount from A. A may require B and C to make equal contributions.
3. Thirdly,
if any one of the promisors makes a default in such contribution, the remaining
joint promisors must bear the deficiency in equal shares. A, B and C are under
a joint promise to pay D 3000 rupees, C is unable to pay anything. The
deficiency must be shared by A and B equally. If C's estate is able to pay
one-half of his share, the balance must be made up by A and B in equal proportions.
Section
43 allows an action to be brought against any one of the joint promisors
without impleading the others as defendants. Suppose now that the creditor sues
only one joint promisor, can he subsequently sue the others? According to the
English law he cannot, but according to Indian Law he can subsequently sue the
others. The creditor is also given the right to release anyone of the joint
promisors from his liability and this does not discharge the others from their
liabilities.
Effect of release of one joint promisor
[Section 44]
Where
two or more persons have made a joint promise, a release of one of such joint
promisors by the promisee does not discharge the other joint promisor or joint
promisors; neither does it free the joint promisor so released from
responsibility to the other joint promisor or joint promisors.
This
section gives to the promisee a right to release any one or more of the
joint-promisor from the liability under the joint promise. Once the release is
granted, the promisee will not be able to file a suit against the released
joint-promisor. But, the liability of the other joint-promisor shall continue
unchanged. Similarly, the liability of the released joint-promisor towards
other joint-promisors for contribution shall also continue. The net result is
that there is no substantive gain to the released joint promisor.
This
also marks a departure from the English Common Law, according to which a
discharge of one joint promisor amounts to a discharge of all, unless the
creditor expressly preserves his rights against them.
Devolution of joint rights [Section 45]
When a
person has made a promise to two or more persons jointly, then, unless a
contrary intention appears from the contract, the right to claim performance
rests, as between him and them) with them during their joint lives, and, after
the death of any of them, with the representatives of such deceased person
jointly with the survivor or survivors, and after the death of the last
survivor, with the representatives of all jointly.
Illustration: A, in consideration
of 5000 rupees, lent to him by B and C, promises B and C jointly to repay them
that sum with interest on a day specified- B dies. The right to claim
performance rests with B’s representative jointly with C during Cs life, and
after the death of C with the representatives of B and C jointly.