NOTES


CA-Foundation > Business Laws > The Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Performance of Contract (Old & New)

State, in brief, the grounds on the basis of which a contract is discharged under the provisions of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 /
When a contract may be discharged under the provisions of Indian Contract Act, 1872 . Explain in detail.



Ans.

1. Discharge by Performance : It is the most usual way of performance of a contract. When the parties to a contract fulfill their obligations arising

out of the contract within the time and in the manner prescribed, the contract is said to have been discharged by performance. If only one party performs his obligation, he alone is discharged, though he gets the right of action against the other party, who is guilty of breach. The performance may either be (i) Actual, or (ii) Attempted :

(i) Actual Performance : When both the parties carry out their premises under the contract in the manner and within the time, it is called actual performance. It makes an end of the contract.

(il) Attempted Performance or Tender : It is not the actual performance, but an offer to perform the obligation under the contract. When the promisor offers to perform the obligation , but other party refuses, it amounts to attempted performance except in the case of tender of money.

2. Discharge by Impossibility of Performance : A contract to do an act, which after the contract is made becomes impossible or unlawful by reason of some event beyond the control of the promisor, becomes void when it becomes impossible or unlawful.

The ‘Rule of Impossibility’ is based on the following maxims, viz:

(i) Lex on cogit ad impossibilia. It means, “the law does not recognize what is impossible”, and

(ii) Impossibilium nulla obligation est. It means, “What is impossible does not create an obligation.”

Therefore, when a person has promised to do something, which he knows or has the reasons with reasonable diligence to know that it is impossible or unlawful, while the promisee does not know about the impossibility or unlawfulness of the promise, such promisor is supposed to compensate to such promisee for any loss caused to him because of the non-performance of the promise.

3. Discharge by Operation of Law : In the following circumstances, the contract is discharge by operation of law i.e. the law regards the contract as discharged.

(i) By Material - alteration of the particulars of a contract by one party without the consent of other party.

(ii) By insolvency of one party.

(iii) By death of a promisor, in case the contract involves personal skill of promisor.

(iv) By merger of rights.

4. Discharge by Lapse of Time : As a matter of fact, the contracts must be performed within the period of limitation, i.e.. the period specified by the Limitation Act. The Limitation Act lays down different limitation periods for different kinds of contracts. If the contract is not performed and the aggrieved party does not enforce his rights within the limitation period, then he is debarred from enforcing the contract. In other words, after the expiry of limitation period the courts will not enforce the contract. And thus, the contract is discharged as the parties cannot enforce their respective obligation through the Courts of Law.

5. Discharge by Agreement: A contract may be discharged by mutual agreement of the concerned parties. The parties may enter into a fresh agreement which provides for the extinguishment of their rights and obligations created by the original contract. In such cases, the original contract is discharged as the parties are not required to perform the original contract due to the fresh agreement.

6. Discharge by Breach of contract : Where a party to the contract breaks the obligation which he has undertaken under the contract, the contract stands discharged by breach, of contract. The breach of contract may either be (i) Actual, or (ii) Anticipatory

(i) Actual Breach of Contract. It may occur:

(a) At the time when performance is due : Actual breach of contract occurs at the time when performance is due, when one party fails or refuses to perform his obligation under the contract.

(b) During the performance of the contract: It occurs when a party fails or refuses to perform the obligation under the contract during the performance of the contract. It may either be express or implied repudiation.

(ii) Anticipatory Breach of Contract: It occurs when a party repudiates his obligation under the contract before the time for performance arrives :

It may either be (a) express, or (b) implied anticipatory breach, viz,:

(a) Express Repudiation or Renunciation: It takes place when one party renounciates his liability under the contract expressly, before the performance becomes due.

(b) Implied Repudiation or By creating impossibility: A promisor may before the time of performance arrives, by doing some act, make the performance of the contract impossible. It also discharges the contract.


Next


Notes of The Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Performance of Contract (Old & New)



  1. State, in brief, the grounds on the basis of which a contract is discharged under the provisions of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 /
    When a contract may be discharged under the provisions of Indian Contract Act, 1872 . Explain in detail.

    see in detail

  2. State the essentials of a valid tender.
    see in detail

  3. “The basic rule is that the promisor must perform exactly what he has promised to perform.” Explain stating the obligation of parties to the contract.
    see in detail

  4. From whom can the performance be claimed? Explain.
    see in detail

  5. Ganesh, Suresh and Mahesh are partners of software business jointly promise to pay ₹ 30,000 to Rupesh. Over a period of time Suresh became insolvent, but his assets are sufficient to pay one-forth of his debts. Mahesh is compelled to pay the whole. Decide whether Mahesh is required to pay whole amount himself to Rupesh in discharging joint promise?
    see in detail