NOTES


CA-Foundation > Business Laws > The Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Discharge of Contract (Old & New)

Define anticipatory breach of contract. Also state its effect on the contracts.



Ans.
DISCHARGE BY BREACH OF CONTRACT

When a contract is broken by one party the other party or parties are freed from the obligation of performing the contract. They can also take the remedial measures to which they are entitled. Breach of contract may arise in two ways:

1. By actual breach or present breach.

2. By anticipatory breach.

ACTUAL BREACH OF CONTRACT

Actual breach of contract occurs when during the performance of the contract or at the time when the performance of the contract is due, one party either fails or refuses to perform his obligations under the contract. The refusal of performance may be express (Le. by word or by writing) or implied (Le. by conduct of the party or by non-action) or abstaining from doing something. D agrees to deliver to B, 5 tons of sugar on 1st June. He fails to do so. There is breach of contract by D.

ANTICIPATORY BREACH OF CONTRACT (Sec. 39)

Anticipatory breach of contract occurs :        

1. when a party before the time for performance is due announces that he is not going to perform the contract or,

2. when a party by his own act disables himself from performing the contract.

a. C enters into a contract to supply B with certain articles on the 1st June. Before 1st June he informs B that he will not be able to supply the goods.

b. X agrees to marry Y. Before the agreed date of marriage, he marries Z.

CONSEQUENCES OF ANTICIPATORY BREACH

When anticipatory breach occurs, the aggrieved party can take the following steps:

(A) May treat the contract as discharged-

(i) He can treat the contract as discharged, so that he is no longer bound by any obligations under the contract; &

(ii) He can immediately adopt the legal remedies available to him for breach of contract, vz'z., file a suit for damages or specific performance or injunction.

(B) May not treat the contract as discharged-

Anticipatory breach, by itself, does not discharge the contract. The contract is discharged, when the aggrieved party chooses to treat it as discharged. The aggrieved party may decide not to rescind the contract but to treat the contract as alive and operative and wait for the time of performance. In such a case the consequences are as follows:

(i) The contract will be operative for the benefit of both the parties. The contract will continue to exist and may even be performed by the other party.

(ii) If the contract is not rescinded and subsequently an event happens which discharges the contract legally (e.g. a supervening impossibility) the aggrieved party loses his right to sue for damages.

For example, A agrees to supply one ton of sugar to B by 20th August. On 10th August, A informs B that he cannot supply sugar B did not accept the refusal and preferred to wait till 20th August. On 15th August, the Minister declares nationalization of sugar industry. Now the contract is discharged and B has no remedy against A.

Next


Notes of The Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Discharge of Contract (Old & New)



  1. Define anticipatory breach of contract. Also state its effect on the contracts.
    see in detail

  2. What are pre-determined damages? State the difference between liquidated damages and penalty.
    see in detail

  3. “Impossibility of performance, is, as a rule, not an excuse from performance.” Explain.
    see in detail

  4. Mr. Swamy of Kerla placed an order with Mr. Varma of Jaipur for supply of urid dual on 10.11.2006 at a contracted price of 40 per kg. The order was for the supply of 10 tonnes within a months' time viz., before 09.12.2006. On 04.12.2006 Mr. Varma wrote a letter to Mr. Swamy stating that the price of urid daal was sky rocketing to 50 Per. Kg. and he would not be able to supply as per original contract. The price of urid daal rose to 53 on 09.12.06 Advise Mr. Swamy citing the legal position.
    see in detail

  5. Aakash contracted with Bakul to supply him (Bakul) 500 tons of iron-steel @ 5,000 per ton, to be delivered at a specified time. Thereafter, Aakash contracts with Chirag for the purchase of 500 tons of iron-steel @ 4,800 per ton, and at the same time told 'Chirag that he did so far the purpose of performing his contract entered into with Bakul. Chirag failed to perform his contract in due course, consequently, Aakash could not procure any iron-steel and Bakul rescinded the contract. What would be the amount of damages which Aakash could claim from Chirag in the circumstances? Explain with reference to the provisions of the Indian Contract, 1872.
    see in detail