NOTES


CA-Foundation > Business Laws > The Indian Partnership Act, 1932 - Reconstitution and Dissolutions of a firm (Old & New)

Simon, Allen and Cajetan are partners. Cajetan is a sleeping partner who has not been known by creditors to be partner of Simon and Allen. Cajetan retires without giving the public notice of his retirement. Is Cajetan liable for subsequent debts incurred by Simon and Allen?



Ans.

Retirement of a Partner (Sec. 32)

A partner may retire

(a) with the consent of all the other partners,

(b) in accordance with the terms of the agreement of partnership or

(c) where the partnership is at will, by giving notice in writing to all the other partners of his intention to retire.

A retiring partner remains liable for the partnership debts contracted while he was a partner. He may however be discharged from any liability to any third party for acts of the firm done before his retirement by novation, if it is so agreed with the third party and the partners of the reconstituted firm. Such agreement may be implied from the course of dealing between the firm and the third party after he had knowledge of the retirement.

The retired partner continues to remain liable to third parties for all acts of the firm until public notice is given of the retirement. Such notice may be given either by the retired partner or by any member of the reconstituted firm. A retired partner is not liable for the debts of the firm incurred after public notice of his retirement. A sleeping partner may retire without giving a public notice of his retirement because he is not known to be a partner to third parties.

PUBLIC NOTICE (SEC. 72)

1. The Partnership Act requires that a public notice must be given in each of the following cases:

(a) On minor attaining majority

A minor partner on becoming a major must give public notice of his intention to remain or not to remain a partner. [Sec. 30(5)]

(b) Retirement of a partner

When a partner retires from the firm, he must give public notice to terminate further liability. [Sec. 32(3)]

(c) Expulsion of a partner

When a partner is expelled from the partnership business he must give public notice to terminate further liability. [Sec. 33]

(d) Dissolution of the firm

When a partnership firm is dissolved, the partners of the dissolved firm must give public notice to terminate further liability [Section 45(1)]

2. Mode of the Public Notice

According to Sec. 72 the Public Notice becomes effective when the following steps have been taken:

(a) The notice has been published in the Official Gazette.

(b) The notice has been published in at least one vernacular newspaper (ie. which is published in Indian language) circulating in the district where the concerned firm has its place or principal place of business.

(c) If the firm is registered, the notice has been sent to the Registrar of Firms.

3. Consequences of not giving public notice

(a) On minor attaining majority

If a minor is admitted to the benefits of partnership under Section 30 he has to give public notice within 6 months of his attaining majority or of his obtaining knowledge that he has been admitted to the benefits of partnership, whichever date is later. If he fails to give notice, that he has elected to become or not to become a partner in the firm, he shall become a partner in the firm on the expiry of the said 6 months and is liable as a partner of the firm.

(b) Retirement of a partner

If a retiring partner does not give a public notice of the retirement from the firm under section 32, he and the other partners shall continue to be liable as partners to third parties for any act done by any of them which would have been an act of the firm if done before the retirement.

(c) Expulsion of a partner

If in case of expulsion of a partner from the firm a public notice is not given, the expelled partner and the other partners shall continue to be liable to third parties dealing with the firm as in the case of a retired partner. [Section 33],

(d) Dissolution of the firm

If a public notice is not given on dissolution of a registered firm, the partners shall be liable to third persons of any act done by any of them which would have been an act of the firm if done before the dissolution (section 45). When public notice is given of the dissolution of a firm, no partner shall have authority to bind the firm except for certain specific purposes as given in Section 47. According to this section, after the dissolution of a firm, the authority of each partner to bind the firm and their mutual rights and obligations of the partners shall continue:

(i) so far as may be necessary wind up the affairs of the firm; and

(ii) to complete transactions begun but unfinished at the time of the dissolution.


PreviousNext


Notes of The Indian Partnership Act, 1932 - Reconstitution and Dissolutions of a firm (Old & New)



  1. What do you mean by the “dissolution of the firm”?
    see in detail

  2. Distinguish between: “Dissolution of partnership” and “dissolution of partnership firm”.
    see in detail

  3. Simon, Allen and Cajetan are partners. Cajetan is a sleeping partner who has not been known by creditors to be partner of Simon and Allen. Cajetan retires without giving the public notice of his retirement. Is Cajetan liable for subsequent debts incurred by Simon and Allen?
    see in detail

  4. Anish, Raj, Simon, Dilip and Eshan are partners in a firm. They decided to dissolve the firm from 1st January, 2006 but failed to give a public notice of its dissolution and continued the business of the firm even after that date. Dilip died on 5th January 2006 and Eshan was declared insolvent on 10th January, 2006. On 11th January 2006, Anish borrowed in the firm's name 20,000 from Rohan who was ignorant of the dissolution. Discuss the liability of partners.
    see in detail

  5. State the cases when Public notice is required to be given as per Partnership Act.
    see in detail